Click here to enlarge imageThe trend in dental hygiene graduates mirrors the dental graduates until 1990. At that point, the number of dental school graduates stabilizes and hygiene graduates increase significantly. Between 1990 and 2002, hygiene graduates increase from 3,953 to 5,693 — an increase of just more than 44 percent. This trend should continue for at least the next decade. The demand for dental hygiene services remains high. In addition, the cost of educating a dental hygienist has decreased because of a change in the educational setting for the training of dental hygienists. In 1967, almost 40 percent of dental hygiene programs were located in dental schools. In 2002, less than 10 percent of the dental hygiene programs were located in dental schools, and almost 74 percent of the programs were located in two-year institutions such as community colleges and technical schools. By 2020, 44 percent more hygienists than dentists could graduate.
In Figure 4, we compare the projected number of graduates to the projected number of dental retirees. Until about 2007, the number of dental graduates exceeds the number of dentists who retire. Around the year 2007, the number of dental retirees probably will exceed the number of dental graduates as many of the baby boomer dentists begin retirement. The graph clearly shows how the enrollment bulge of the 1970s and early 1980s is mirrored in the retirement bulge that will take place during the next 15 to 20 years. Economic conditions will impact the accuracy of the projected number of retirees. Favorable economic conditions could result in a higher number of retirees at an earlier time. Still, poor economic conditions could significantly reduce the retirement rate of dentists during the next decade.
Dental retirements vs. graduates will impact dental manpower projections. When the number of retirees exceeds the number of dental school gradates, it will impact the future of dental manpower in the United States. The next article in this series will explore manpower projections and look at the manpower implications of changes in different segments of the dental population.