It is easy to see that the more people involved in the ordering process, the more people who are compensated as a result of the order. Virtually all dental distributors have sales representatives who oversee each account and are compensated on sales by those accounts. Some companies utilize the traditional sales representative who physically calls on each office and facilitates order placement and supports that office. Other distributors utilize "tele-sales" representatives who facilitate order placement and support from a remote location.
Both of these types of service models are extremely important in the supply industry, as the diverse population of practitioners want different types of representatives. A field representative cannot support as many offices as a "tele-sales" representative due to time requirements. There are advantages and disadvantages to both of these sales/support models, and each practitioner must examine which model has the greatest benefit to their practice.
As in all businesses, companies have differing methods of compensating representatives, as well as differing pricing structures for products. The two main methods for dental representative compensation are a percentage of gross sales, or a calculation that includes the margin on the overall order. Company A may pay based on overall sales, which results in their representative being paid a flat percentage based on overall sales. Conversely, if company B pays on a metric, then the representative can receive a higher amount of compensation based on a greater margin realized on the sale.
Companies can also have pricing tiers where there is a margin level set for each tier. Offices are traditionally set in a tier based on their annual purchases. The greater the purchases, the higher the tier and the lower the cost. Another pricing model that occurs is formulary pricing. A formulary is an equation created where a merchant will price some items at a very low price, only to charge full retail for other items. This can be seen when a vendor matches or beats another vendor on a list of items, only to charge a higher amount on other items to make up the difference. With price matching, there are also instances where a vendor "matches" the price on specific items, only to slowly increase the cost of those items over time.
The final factor that practitioners should evaluate is the rise of the dental group purchasing organization (GPO). GPOs have been prevalent in medicine for some time. Technology improvements and electronic media have allowed them to rise in the dental space. GPOs typically band practitioners together and leverage their buying power to negotiate savings on products and supplies. The overall goal of a GPO is to allow all of the member practices to pay the same low rate on their supplies. GPOs attempt to "level the playing field" by putting all members on the same tier, regardless of size or volume. There are a variety of platforms for GPOs. These can be thought of in the same way as investment platforms. There are three major types of GPOs:
1. Fee-based. The subscriber pays the organization an annual or monthly fee to have access to the group's negotiated agreements. These fees typically range from $500 to several thousand dollars annually.
2. Percentage-based. These groups charge the subscriber anywhere from 5% to 20% on the total purchases per order. Many times these groups also have ordering and billing through their proprietary software.
3. No fee. This is a platform where the purchasing group does not charge the member any fees. The purchasing group is usually paid a percentage of total sales by the vendor.
Purchasing groups also vary in what is required of members. Some call for members to sign contracts and reach a certain spending level. Some require members to purchase for a certain period of time, while others call for no contract, spending minimums, or fees.
Like everything in dentistry, the supply industry is diverse. There are a variety of methods to achieve the goal of procuring dental supplies. One has to decide if supplies are simply a consumable commodity that should be purchased at the lowest cost, or if the practice needs the services of a company that charges a premium for supplies in exchange for other services that the representative may provide to the practice. There is also a middle ground where a practice can have aspects of both. Understanding factors that affect supply costs helps owners choose the best procurement scenario for their practice.
Each factor has a meaningful impact on overall cost of supplies and can result in cost savings for a practice. On average, a practice spends 6% to 7% of gross production on supplies. If you have a $1 million practice, 6% equals $60,000 in annual consumable purchases. By utilizing the most beneficial supply-saving methods mentioned here, a practice can save 17% to 20% on supplies. A 20% savings on $60,000 of supply expenses can result in $12,000 of annual savings. If practitioners can save and invest this amount annually, it can have a meaningful impact on their ability to cover costs, invest in technology, or even on their retirement date.
As practice owners, we have to be more than great clinicians to be successful. We must be the best CFOs of our small corporations. Being a great dental CFO involves a thorough understanding of the dental industry as a whole.
Endnotes
1. U.S. Bureau, Economic Census. Data accessed at www.census.gov/econ/census07/.
2. From the 2013 HSIC 10-K (filed 2/11/14)
Mustafa Shah-Khan, DDS, is a graduate of the Univ. of North Carolina School of Dentistry, where he served on the board of directors for the Dental Alumni Association. He is CEO and founder of Synergy Dental Partners and maintains a private practice emphasizing cosmetic reconstructive dentistry in Charlotte, N.C.